Friday, 21st November 2008

   home     about     authors     news     books     xml feed     sitemap     privacy     contact us

There are 5 users online

add to favorites
make home page


Books and Reading
Business Education
Business Industry
Business Services and Assistants
Business Technology
Corporate Companies
Current Events
E-Commerce and Internet
Economics
Employment and Opportunities
Finances
International Business
Investing
Management Editorials
Partnerships and Affiliate Programs
Promotion and Marketing
Seminars and Salesmanship
Small/Home Business
Statistics
Tax Related
The Stock Market
Tips and Strategies
Tools for Business

Our Newsletter

Sign up for our free
Business-Informant.com Ezine
Get all the latest Business News delivered right to your mailbox.


First Name:

Your Email:



We will never rent, share or sell your name to anyone else... ever! We respect your privacy!
  Other Resources


For other sources of business news, tips, and information, visit our resources page

 

  Submit an Article


Would you like to have your article posted?

More info on business issues
 

 
 
 
debt consolidation pic
debt pic
april 15th pic

Truth in Corporate Justice LLC: Lead Plaintiff in Halliburton Securities Litigation
Added: 01/05/2007
Type: Summary
Viewed: 94 time(s)
[ Not Rated Yet ]

How would you rate this article:    Bad Good   Go » 
Truth in Corporate Justice LLC: Lead Plaintiff in Halliburton Securities Litigation

Truth in Corporate Justice LLC ("TCJ") (www.worldwidetree.org) issues this press release to advise shareholders and the concerned public that the Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. ("AMS Fund"), Lead Plaintiff in the Halliburton Securities Litigation matter, is seeking to substitute lead counsel. This case is entitled: Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc., et al. v. Halliburton Company, et al. (Master Docket No. 3:02-CV-1152-M), a consolidated class action pending in the Northern District of Texas before U.S. District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn.

This is not about guilt or innocence; it is about the appearance of impropriety, conflicts of interest, and ethical behavior.
On December 27, 2006, AMS Fund filed its Reply Brief on its Motion to Substitute Counsel. The brief cites numerous reasons for AMS Fund’s request to remove the firms of Scott + Scott and Lerach, Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins as lead counsel in this matter. Truth in Corporate Justice LLC’s founder, Neil Rothstein (a former Scott + Scott partner), Special Counsel to the AMS Fund, stated that this is an unfortunate but necessary change that was unexpected at the time Mr. Lerach’s firm first intervened in this case.

Some of the most important reasons for the change in counsel request, as stated in the Reply Brief filed on December 27, 2006, are the failure of lead counsel to keep AMS Fund fully informed about the status of the case in violation of Pre-trial Order Number Two. Next, according to the Reply Brief, there exists a potentially negative impact on the litigation as a result of the proliferation of media attention surrounding William S. Lerach, which could possibly shift the focus from the merits of the case and turn it into a convoluted battle between Lerach and the government. The conflict: an attorney under federal investigation is representing a lead plaintiff who has brought a lawsuit against a sitting vice president’s former company where he was Chief Executive Officer. The Vice President is not a defendant in this action. The Reply Brief also states that the Department of Justice’s ongoing criminal investigation of Lerach and his former firm, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, which has led to the indictment of two of Lerach’s former partners and his predecessor firm, has brought to light facts not disclosed to the Court or Lead Plaintiff (as summarized in the Fortune.com article published recently available at
http://money.cnn.com/blogs/legalpad).

The AMS Fund is requesting the court to substitute the firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner as lead counsel. The Court has not yet ruled on the motion. Neil Rothstein, founder of TCJ, says that it is unfortunate that another change in counsel is necessary at this time; however, the amount of information that the current lead counsel hid from the Lead Plaintiff clearly does not comport with what is in the best interest of the client or the class. "While the Lead Plaintiff sought to have this transition occur with the dignities of those involved remaining intact, the realities amount to far more than the loss of dignity," stated Rothstein. "This is not about guilt or innocence; it is about the appearance of impropriety, conflicts of interest, and ethical behavior."

Article Pages:  1  



credit pic
taxes pic
debt consolidation pic

  Article Comments   Add Comment | View All (0)
    There are currently no comments for this article.


Advanced Search

More Resources

Become a Day Trader

Early Warning Services

ecommerce shopping cart

Find the Perfect Job


Affiliate With Us
 


All content © 2008 Webmaster, Truth in Corporate Justice LLC: Lead Plaintiff in Halliburton Securities Litigation :: Business Articles and Info.